As by keeping this site up and running,MrPattinson.com
needs you, the visitors help to donate some funds to this site. I
need to buy several resources which can costs me loads of bucks.
Your help would be kindly appreciated.
To get your daily, weekly latest up-to-date news and updates of Robert Pattinson from MrPattinson.com, fill up the subscription form here to get news via your email.
MrPattinson.com is an unofficial fansite. I'm in no way
affiliated with Robert
Pattinson or anyone else connected with "Robert Pattinson"
management. Please do not send any fanmail or hatemail
to me. All graphics are made by me unless stated, please do not
reprint, copy or steal without premission given. This site is
non-profit, and is in no way trying to infringe on copyrights.
Currently there are 29 Users Online
and most ever fans online browsing the site are 124 on October 22, 2012 @ 2:38 pm.
Working with Robert Pattinson in Cosmopolis, is it that same process of really focusing on your actor and giving him a lot of freedom? He’s in every scene. It’s quite a different structure from A Dangerous Method. I think the only similarity really is that there’s a lot of dialogue, but it’s a very different kind of dialogue, a completely different kind of movie. I did shoot it even more ascetically. We finished 5 days early, and I did my director’s cut in two days. That’s a record for me. And yet it seems to work really well. Basically you’re not giving your editors much to work with. At moments he was begging me to do coverage and I wouldn’t. I said I don’t need that closeup, I don’t want that. I’m confident that letting it hang in the long shot is the way to do it. There are classic mistakes that young directors make, they get so enamored of this tricky dolly shot or steadicam shot, then they don’t want to do closeups because they think they’ve done this genius shot, then in the editing room they realize all the emotion, they can’t see it. you have to do closeups. But that’s a lesson you learn very early on in your career as a director. You have to have unshakeable confidence if you’re not going to do that coverage. You have to know this is exactly what I want it to be.
Viggo Mortensen, Magneto, and a movie with Rob Pattinson next, with all that Twilight hoopla around him. You donâ€™t mind stars with franchise baggage it seems. Itâ€™s like with Viggo with The Lord of the Rings, frankly. Weâ€™ve talked about this a lot. He wouldnâ€™t have been a candidate for A History of Violence if it hadnâ€™t been for Lord of the Rings because he wasnâ€™t well-known, he was really kind of a B actor, character actor before Lord of the Rings made him a star. Therefore, he would not be somebody who could get you the financing that you need. Itâ€™s something about casting that people donâ€™t think about but as a director, you really have to think about it because your producers make you think about it and so do your distributors. You say, â€śI want this guy,â€ť and they say â€śForget it! Nobody knows who he is and we canâ€™t build a campaign around him to release to movie.â€ť So not only do you have to get the right guy, you have to figure out who that guy is creatively but he has to want to do it to, you have to be able to afford him, he has to be available at the time you want him and he has to have the star power to get your movie financed. Itâ€™s very tricky casting a movie and for a director itâ€™s a huge part of what you do, to weave your way through this mine field and end up with the right guy in your movie. Because if you make a huge miscasting mistake, it can kill your movie before youâ€™ve even shot a foot of film.
Have you ever made any huge casting mistakes? Yes, but I wonâ€™t talk about them! [laughs] But not enough to kill the movie, I must say. There are only one or two that I would maybe have rethought. But you get lucky sometimes and sometimes the right person not only says yes and sometimes the right person says no. In other words, for some reason youâ€™ve decided to go with somebody and you later realize, â€śThank god that guy didnâ€™t do the movie because this guy is the right guy.â€ť But about Rob Pattinson, yeah, of course, if it werenâ€™t for Twilight I donâ€™t think we could have financed the movie around him because he wouldnâ€™t be known. But aside from that, that was a good thing not a bad thing and of course I have to think about all that.
Especially with a movie thatâ€™s so focused on one character. Absolutely. You make a bad choice and youâ€™ve killed your movie right away or at least youâ€™re staggering through it trying desperately to compensate for whatâ€™s not there that should have been there. I felt really lucky to have Rob, heâ€™s fantastic, and I think people will see that itâ€™s obvious. I donâ€™t think itâ€™s going to be a surprise.
Warner: The film stars Robert Pattinson of â€śThe Twilight Sagaâ€ť series. Do you think he can escape his vampire pigeonhole? Cronenberg: Heâ€™s a terrific actor, which will be obvious when you see the movie. Any director whoâ€™s looking to see what he can do will see that he can do a lot.